From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59167)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pl@kamp.de>)
	id 1XgveZ-00019j-P1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:08:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pl@kamp.de>) id 1XgveS-00029M-H7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:08:39 -0400
Received: from mx-v6.kamp.de ([2a02:248:0:51::16]:53248 helo=mx01.kamp.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pl@kamp.de>)
	id 1XgveS-00028E-42
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:08:32 -0400
Message-ID: <5447AC49.8020309@kamp.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:08:25 +0200
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1413805631-11626-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
	<20141022120323.GG3188@noname.str.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141022120323.GG3188@noname.str.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: qemu-iotests change
 _supported_proto to file once more.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: famz@redhat.com, benoit@irqsave.net, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com

Am 22.10.2014 um 14:03 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 20.10.2014 um 13:47 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
>> In preparation to possible automatic regression and performance
>> testing for the block layer I found that the iotests don't work
>> for all protocols anymore.
>>
>> In commit 1f7bf7d0 I started to change supported protocols from
>> generic to file for various tests. Unfortunately, some tests
>> added in the meantime again carry generic protocol altough they
>> can only work with file because they require local file access.
>>
>> The other way around for some tests that only support file I added
>> NFS protocol after confirming they work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> Thanks, applied to the block branch.
>
> I suspect the test cases where you added nfs are actually generic. Did
> you check this?
likely yes, but I didn't test, as I currently have no resources to check special protocols
that require additional setup like gluster, sheepdog etc.

Peter