qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Peter Lieven" <pl@kamp.de>,
	"Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@nodalink.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Print error if check failed
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:07:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54490BBD.8010006@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544909A6.2020204@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2245 bytes --]

On 10/23/2014 07:59 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2014-10-23 at 15:51, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 10/23/2014 07:29 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> Currently, if bdrv_check() fails either by returning -errno or having
>>> check_errors set, qemu-img check just exits with 1 after having told the
>>> user that there were no errors on the image. This is bad.
>>>
>>> Instead of printing the check result if there were internal errors which
>>> were so bad that bdrv_check() could not even complete with 0 as a return
>>> value, qemu-img check should inform the user about the error.
>>>
>> Is there a way to exercise this in the testsuite?
> 
> It would involve some blkdebug things which try to break the qcow2 check
> function. I wouldn't rely on it, because this rather exercises the qcow2
> check function than this patch.

Fair enough.

>>> +        case OFORMAT_JSON:
>>> +            dump_json_image_check(check, quiet);
>>> +            break;
>>> +        }
>>>       }
>>>         if (ret || check->check_errors) {
>> Can we ever have ret == 0 (so we attempted dump_*_image_check) AND
>> check->check_errors?  Will that be confusing output, to have both a
>> (probably incorrect) dump on stdout and an error message on stderr?
> 
> Yes, I think we can. I interpreted that as "Test completed, but there
> were errors". The dump should not be incorrect, because if it was, the
> check function should not have returned 0.
> 
> Therefore, I think we should dump the test result because by returning 0
> the check function says it's valid. If there were check_errors, the dump
> function will show their number, too.

Furthermore, if 'quiet' is true, then the dump_* call probably output
nothing, but the fact that we want to return non-zero to flag that check
detected problems is worth being noisy about.  If I understand
correctly, 'quiet' is only about suppressing stdout, not stderr, and
always being noisy on stderr for non-zero exit is a good idea.

Okay, I think your answers convinced me, and I'm comfortable enough with
the patch as-is to give:
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-23 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-23 13:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Print error if check failed Max Reitz
2014-10-23 13:51 ` Eric Blake
2014-10-23 13:59   ` Max Reitz
2014-10-23 14:07     ` Eric Blake [this message]
2014-10-23 14:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-10-23 15:01 ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54490BBD.8010006@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=benoit.canet@nodalink.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).