From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XifNh-0006mK-H5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 04:10:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XifNb-0000eB-LI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 04:10:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XifNb-0000e5-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 04:10:19 -0400 Message-ID: <544DFDE7.2010706@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:10:15 +0100 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201410251500076342482@sangfor.com> In-Reply-To: <201410251500076342482@sangfor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] How is the progress of optimizing qcow2_check_metadata_overlap() with reagard to cpu overhead? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhang Haoyu , qemu-devel Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi On 2014-10-25 at 09:00, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > Hi, Max > > How is the progress of optimizing qcow2_check_metadata_overlap? > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/127037/focus=127364 > > Thanks, > Zhang Haoyu Hi Zhang Haoyu, there are still a couple of upstream series I've worked on for some months which I need to take care of first (and, as I'm working for Red Hat, there are also some RHEL things I need to work on). So until now, I did not have the time to look further into this than making a concept. I'm hoping to get to it in two weeks or so. Kind regards, Max