From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjR95-0005me-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:10:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjR8z-0000iv-A2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:10:31 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33356 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjR8y-0000il-RU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:10:25 -0400 Message-ID: <5450CB1F.5090601@suse.de> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:10:23 +0100 From: Hannes Reinecke MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1414569232-21357-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <5450B0CA.5090207@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5450B0CA.5090207@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/17] megasas: gen2 emulation and MSI-X fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Andreas Faerber On 10/29/2014 10:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/29/2014 08:53 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> here is an update to the megasas emulation. It adds a new emulation >> type (called 'megasas-gen2'), which emulates a newer (PCIe-based) >> version of the MegaRAID HBA. As this hardware does MSI-X I've also >> fixed up MSI-X support for the megasas emulation. >> With these patches Win7 and Linux boot happily with MSI-X. >> Additionally I've found some issues in the ahci and atapi code >> which prevented OVMF/DUET from booting. >=20 > Looks good, apart from patches 4 and 5 and a minor issue in patch 12. >=20 > Patches 1 and 2 need to go through the IDE maintainers (CCed). >=20 > What would happen if I took patches 3 and 6-17 alone through the SCSI > tree?... >=20 Well, patch 1 & 2 are really unrelated fixes (I've only stumbled across them when trying to install via CDROM from OVMF/DUET), so it'd be fine with those. Patch for is really only for debugging, so it's more a cleanup than fixing a real issue. Patch 5 is something I'm relying on for the later patches, so I'd need to rework the patchset. Nothing major, though; the later patches should work even with patch 5 pulled. Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)