From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60359)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XjUua-0007YX-Vg
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XjUuR-0003tJ-VV
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:48 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]:36109)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1XjUuR-0003t2-NB
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:39 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u10so721310lbd.30
	for <Qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <545103A7.203@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:11:35 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2753E2F1-FF07-467C-8DCC-569A5BCDA915@livius.net>	<CAFEAcA9FgL+BFAEZ32zkM_uQpt2o_qPxV=G7HGR0EMdQ9SzqAA@mail.gmail.com>	<8B682701-7ECB-4741-917F-ABDFB5F576B9@livius.net>	<CAFEAcA8MhYbSFpGcxVJyFmaV64BSJY7whJih5-Die9bxFV=dxw@mail.gmail.com>	<5200B6C9-6E30-4B71-9DEB-42BBCD873FC9@livius.net>	<CAFEAcA9+efzse41poCN1E5P_FyqAESfzU0u_=rdwseNbfC+VyA@mail.gmail.com>	<0ECC542D-7CF1-4D17-B689-46DF4CCE8F7D@livius.net>	<CAFEAcA9QXLz+qCrwF2ksr2vMPsBD+9WgascQgRs7e_MDg5fa_w@mail.gmail.com>	<DA86ED53-88D0-4C99-82C6-F0EE2C2A15D9@livius.net>	<CAFEAcA8aTaHwuor3L+uprev8N_SiM7Ofuj3w6mvCq4PMCx9bBg@mail.gmail.com>	<CD09C9F0-6539-443F-A108-C82882A57F4C@livius.net>
	<CAFEAcA-qskHhrBxRSXBHSBqqWon+qVhqXMJPY6T5z1brFAL5AA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-qskHhrBxRSXBHSBqqWon+qVhqXMJPY6T5z1brFAL5AA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Liviu Ionescu <ilg@livius.net>
Cc: QEMU Developers <Qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 10/28/2014 03:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I think writes via gdb will be treated in the same way as
> writes by the CPU (ie interpreted as attempts to program
> the flash device). QEMU doesn't support a "debug access"
> abstraction.

I think they should work right.  See cpu_memory_rw_debug.

Paolo