From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com>,
'Peter Maydell' <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: 'QEMU Developers' <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] translate-all: wrapped map_exec() in #ifdef
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:16:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545747F2.4050403@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00d701cff73e$c395a130$4ac0e390$@samsung.com>
03.11.2014 11:18, SeokYeon Hwang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.maydell@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 3:30 AM
>> To: SeokYeon Hwang
>> Cc: QEMU Developers
>> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] translate-all: wrapped map_exec() in
>> #ifdef
>>
>> On 31 October 2014 04:59, SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Moved map_exec() and wrapped it in #ifdef to avoid "-Wunused-function"
>> on clang 3.4 or later.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com>
>>
>> I had this kind of on my todo list too, but I didn't much like the nested
>> ifdefs which are really only because of what the different implementations
>> of alloc_code_gen_buffer() happen to do. I think it would be more robust
>> to just mark the functions with the 'unused' attribute instead of relying
>> on 'inline' to implicitly do this for us:
>>
>> --- a/translate-all.c
>> +++ b/translate-all.c
>> @@ -270,14 +270,14 @@ bool cpu_restore_state(CPUState *cpu, uintptr_t
>> retaddr) }
>>
>> #ifdef _WIN32
>> -static inline void map_exec(void *addr, long size)
>> +static __attribute__((unused)) void map_exec(void *addr, long size)
>> {
>> DWORD old_protect;
>> VirtualProtect(addr, size,
>> PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &old_protect); }
In which case this function isn't used on windows? I mean, is it really
necessary to mark it as unused for win32 case?
>> #else
>> -static inline void map_exec(void *addr, long size)
>> +static __attribute__((unused)) void map_exec(void *addr, long size)
>> {
>> unsigned long start, end, page_size;
How about this instead:
--- a/translate-all.c
+++ b/translate-all.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static inline void map_exec(void *addr, long size)
VirtualProtect(addr, size,
PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &old_protect);
}
-#else
+#elif !defined(USE_MMAP)
static inline void map_exec(void *addr, long size)
{
unsigned long start, end, page_size;
? (Untested, but just to show an idea)... ;)
Thanks,
/mjt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-31 4:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] translate-all: wrapped map_exec() in #ifdef SeokYeon Hwang
2014-10-31 18:30 ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-03 8:18 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-03 9:16 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2014-11-03 12:25 ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-03 14:27 ` Michael Tokarev
2014-11-03 15:05 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545747F2.4050403@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=syeon.hwang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).