From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xlat0-0000OD-TG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 04:58:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xlasu-0000bs-Ot for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 04:58:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xlasu-0000bL-GO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 04:58:44 -0500 Message-ID: <5458A347.40201@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:58:31 +0100 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1414639364-4499-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1414639364-4499-5-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1414639364-4499-5-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/10] hbitmap: Add hbitmap_copy List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , Benoit Canet , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskij , Markus Armbruster , Luiz Capitulino , John Snow , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jd , Paolo Bonzini On 2014-10-30 at 04:22, Fam Zheng wrote: > This makes a deep copy of an HBitmap. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > --- > include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 8 ++++++++ > util/hbitmap.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h > index 550d7ce..b645cfc 100644 > --- a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h > +++ b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h > @@ -65,6 +65,14 @@ struct HBitmapIter { > HBitmap *hbitmap_alloc(uint64_t size, int granularity); > > /** > + * hbitmap_copy: > + * @bitmap: The original bitmap to copy. > + * > + * Copy a HBitmap. > + */ > +HBitmap *hbitmap_copy(const HBitmap *bitmap); > + > +/** > * hbitmap_empty: > * @hb: HBitmap to operate on. > * > diff --git a/util/hbitmap.c b/util/hbitmap.c > index b3060e6..78d449e 100644 > --- a/util/hbitmap.c > +++ b/util/hbitmap.c > @@ -395,3 +395,19 @@ HBitmap *hbitmap_alloc(uint64_t size, int granularity) > hb->levels[0][0] |= 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1); > return hb; > } > + > +HBitmap *hbitmap_copy(const HBitmap *bitmap) > +{ > + int i; > + int64_t size; Why not uint64_t, like HBitmap::size? Not that it matters in practice, I hope. > + HBitmap *hb = g_memdup(bitmap, sizeof(struct HBitmap)); "struct" can be omitted. > + > + size = bitmap->size; > + for (i = HBITMAP_LEVELS; i-- > 0; ) { Urgh... I'd prefer "for (i = HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1; i >= 0; i--)" though yours is correct and shorter. > + size = MAX((size + BITS_PER_LONG - 1) >> BITS_PER_LEVEL, 1); > + hb->levels[i] = g_memdup(bitmap->levels[i], > + size * sizeof(unsigned long)); > + } > + > + return hb; > +} With or without any of the changes: Reviewed-by: Max Reitz