From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli1m-0004E3-T8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:36:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli1g-0006H8-P6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:36:22 -0500 Message-ID: <54590E76.1090409@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:35:50 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1406303338-13212-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1406303338-13212-3-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20141103173627.GC29967@work-vm> <5458FF16.6050201@redhat.com> <20141104164610.GA32459@redhat.com> <545904C2.1040300@redhat.com> <20141104172526.GA32696@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20141104172526.GA32696@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.1 2/2] acpi: mark ACPI tables ROM blob as extend-able on migration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Igor Mammedov , lersek@redhat.com On 04/11/2014 18:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> (Regarding recompilation with a different iasl version, SSDT blocks are >> simple enough that I think we can just build them in C code. We're >> already doing it for the much more complicated PCI bridge hotplug >> interface. BTW, can you pick up at least the patch to move the memory >> hotplug device from SSDT to DSDT?). >> >> Paolo > > I'm not against that - does this have value by itself? It matches more closely what we do for processors, and is more faithful to the idea that the SSDTs express supplementary functionality. Paolo