From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnBW-0001oG-Aw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:31:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnBO-0004vF-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:31:02 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:50436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnBO-0004v5-Hs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:30:54 -0500 Message-ID: <5460A1E4.6060406@Vivier.EU> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:30:44 +0100 From: Laurent Vivier MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <36D1AB4E1AAC4541A1C88167C7231D0B74BAAD@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local> <545CA9CB.8080108@suse.de> <36D1AB4E1AAC4541A1C88167C7231D0B74C307@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local> In-Reply-To: <36D1AB4E1AAC4541A1C88167C7231D0B74C307@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Eta6IxBuGTVrbDqwWlCnKeUJ4Gv6qPTAg" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiAgQWRkIENNUDIgaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb24=?= List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Guo, Lei" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Andreas Schwab , Thomas Huth This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Eta6IxBuGTVrbDqwWlCnKeUJ4Gv6qPTAg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 10/11/2014 04:21, Guo, Lei a =C3=A9crit : > Hi Andreas > Thanks a lot for your patients. Because I'm a newer to this , I'll fol= low your advices and pay much more attention to these details. > Besides ,I have replied to Thomas' question on my previous submission. If the question was "Have you been in touch with the author of that original patch already?", I can affirm the answer is "no". It's opensoure, grab what you want, but if you resend a patch you must let the "Signed-off-by". BTW, "CMP2" is neither generated by gcc or used by linux, why do you want to add it to an old and obsolete architecture ? Do you have a "real life" test case for it ? If you send a correct and tested new patch, I can add it in my tree. Mainline QEMU doesn't care of m68k (680x0) support. For those who want to know why I don't submit my patches the reasons are = : - they break coldfire support - there is a bug in MMU emulation that prevent linux to fork new processes (I'm hunting this for 2 years now...) Regards, Laurent --Eta6IxBuGTVrbDqwWlCnKeUJ4Gv6qPTAg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlRgoeQACgkQNKT2yavzbFPaewCbB18fYys4VTFlH3pzbTWNqeCj WqQAnj8xsFGkYt6sU4swXAl671R5RbKb =LMwn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Eta6IxBuGTVrbDqwWlCnKeUJ4Gv6qPTAg--