From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XoZDR-0007WJ-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:48:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XoZDL-0005nU-EF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:48:13 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:57715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XoZDL-0005nN-4r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:48:07 -0500 Message-ID: <54637322.5060101@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:48:02 -0500 From: Christopher Covington MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5461F18C.2080400@redhat.com> <54624710.6070306@codeaurora.org> <20141112090554.6dc15b9f@hananiah.suse.cz> <54635E0C.5090802@codeaurora.org> <20141112142601.58a4c214@hananiah.suse.cz> <54636A42.9020508@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54636A42.9020508@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] uniquely identifying KDUMP files that originate from QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek , Petr Tesarik Cc: Ekaterina Tumanova , kexec@lists.infradead.org, qemu devel list , Qiao Nuohan , Dave Anderson , kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, crash-utility@redhat.com Thanks Petr and Laszlo for entertaining my questions. I've got one last one if you have the time. On 11/12/2014 09:10 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 11/12/14 14:26, Petr Tesarik wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500 >> Christopher Covington wrote: >> >>> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote: >>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500 >>>> Christopher Covington wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>>>>> (Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the kexec list; please >>>>>> keep me CC'd.) >>>>>> >>>>>> QEMU is able to dump the guest's memory in KDUMP format (kdump-zlib, >>>>>> kdump-lzo, kdump-snappy) with the "dump-guest-memory" QMP command. >>>>>> >>>>>> The resultant vmcore is usually analyzed with the "crash" utility. >>>>>> >>>>>> The original tool producing such files is kdump. Unlike the procedure >>>>>> performed by QEMU, kdump runs from *within* the guest (under a kexec'd >>>>>> kdump kernel), and has more information about the original guest kernel >>>>>> state (which is being dumped) than QEMU. To QEMU, the guest kernel state >>>>>> is opaque. >>>>>> >>>>>> For this reason, the kdump preparation logic in QEMU hardcodes a number >>>>>> of fields in the kdump header. The direct issue is the "phys_base" >>>>>> field. Refer to dump.c, functions create_header32(), create_header64(), >>>>>> and "include/sysemu/dump.h", macro PHYS_BASE (with the replacement text >>>>>> "0"). >>>>>> >>>>>> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=dump.c;h=9c7dad8f865af3b778589dd0847e450ba9a75b9d;hb=HEAD >>>>>> >>>>>> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=include/sysemu/dump.h;h=7e4ec5c7d96fb39c943d970d1683aa2dc171c933;hb=HEAD >>>>>> >>>>>> This works in most cases, because the guest Linux kernel indeed tends to >>>>>> be loaded at guest-phys address 0. However, when the guest Linux kernel >>>>>> is booted on top of OVMF (which has a somewhat unusual UEFI memory map), >>>>>> then the guest Linux kernel is loaded at 16MB, thereby getting out of >>>>>> sync with the phys_base=0 setting visible in the KDUMP header. >>>>>> >>>>>> This trips up the "crash" utility. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave worked around the issue in "crash" for ELF format dumps -- "crash" >>>>>> can identify QEMU as the originator of the vmcore by finding the QEMU >>>>>> notes in the ELF vmcore. If those are present, then "crash" employs a >>>>>> heuristic, probing for a phys_base up to 32MB, in 1MB steps. >>>>> >>>>> What advantages does KDUMP have over ELF? >>>> >>>> It's smaller (data is compressed), and it contains a header with some >>>> useful information (e.g. the crashed kernel's version and release). > > Another advantage is that all zero-filled pages are represented in the > kdump file by one shared zero page. > > The difference in speed of dumping is stunning. Would you expect using SHT_NOBITS to give a similar speedup to the ELF dumper? Thanks, Chris -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project