From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, tony@bakeyournoodle.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] raw-posix: SEEK_HOLE suffices, get rid of FIEMAP
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:19:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5464859E.30401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415873823-13844-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
On 2014-11-13 at 11:17, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Commit 5500316 (May 2012) implemented raw_co_is_allocated() as
> follows:
>
> 1. If defined(CONFIG_FIEMAP), use the FS_IOC_FIEMAP ioctl
>
> 2. Else if defined(SEEK_HOLE) && defined(SEEK_DATA), use lseek()
>
> 3. Else pretend there are no holes
>
> Later on, raw_co_is_allocated() was generalized to
> raw_co_get_block_status().
>
> Commit 4f11aa8 (May 2014) changed it to try the three methods in order
> until success, because "there may be implementations which support
> [SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA] but not [FIEMAP] (e.g., NFSv4.2) as well as vice
> versa."
>
> Unfortunately, we used FIEMAP incorrectly: we lacked FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC.
> Commit 38c4d0a (Sep 2014) added it. Because that's a significant
> speed hit, the next commit 7c159037 put SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA first.
>
> As you see, the obvious use of FIEMAP is wrong, and the correct use is
> slow. I guess this puts it somewhere between -7 "The obvious use is
> wrong" and -10 "It's impossible to get right" on Rusty Russel's Hard
> to Misuse scale[*].
>
> "Fortunately", the FIEMAP code is used only when
>
> * SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA arent't defined, but CONFIG_FIEMAP is
>
> Uncommon. SEEK_HOLE had no XFS implementation between 2011 (when it
> was introduced for ext4 and btrfs) and 2012.
>
> * SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA and CONFIG_FIEMAP are defined, but lseek() fails
>
> Unlikely.
>
> Thus, the FIEMAP code executes rarely. Makes it a nice hidey-hole for
> bugs. Worse, bugs hiding there can theoretically bite even on a host
> that has SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA.
>
> I don't want to worry about this crap, not even theoretically. Get
> rid of it.
>
> [*] http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-04-01.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/raw-posix.c | 60 ++++---------------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 10:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] raw-posix: Get rid of FIEMAP, and more Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 10:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] raw-posix: Fix comment for raw_co_get_block_status() Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 10:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] raw-posix: SEEK_HOLE suffices, get rid of FIEMAP Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 10:19 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2014-11-13 14:09 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 10:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] raw-posix: Fix try_seek_hole()'s handling of SEEK_DATA failure Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 10:22 ` Max Reitz
2014-11-13 13:03 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-11-13 14:52 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 15:29 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 15:44 ` Max Reitz
2014-11-13 15:49 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 15:52 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 15:47 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 16:01 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-14 13:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-15 0:47 ` Eric Blake
2014-11-13 10:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] raw-posix: Clean up around raw_co_get_block_status() Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 10:27 ` Max Reitz
2014-11-13 12:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-13 13:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] raw-posix: Get rid of FIEMAP, and more Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5464859E.30401@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tony@bakeyournoodle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).