From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqSSb-0005m3-C1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:59:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqSSR-0002Ta-Fo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:59:41 -0500 Received: from nm23-vm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.97.16]:48650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqSSR-0002TJ-2o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:59:31 -0500 Message-ID: <546A53A0.4070308@yahoo.co.uk> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:59:28 +0000 From: lejeczek MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] hostdev a Xeon Phi List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org hi everybody No libvirt neither qemu mailing list could say, surely developers will know thus.. I'd like to ask around if Xeon Phis are any good for passthrough? Are there any plans for near future or maybe there are already some success stories using this product? many thanks, P.