From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrboN-0008Fo-BS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:11:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrboI-0004AS-Cr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:10:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrboI-0004AK-4j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:10:50 -0500 Message-ID: <546E8304.7060802@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:10:44 -0700 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1415365933-3727-1-git-send-email-fromani@redhat.com> <1415365933-3727-2-git-send-email-fromani@redhat.com> <20141117164936.GL16192@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <20141120103053.GA9266@noname.redhat.com> <20141120110456.GA11224@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20141120110456.GA11224@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dcVjnhcHU2JO6AmPGImVV10hkofFxxBDj" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v2] block: add write threshold reporting for block devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi , Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Francesco Romani , mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --dcVjnhcHU2JO6AmPGImVV10hkofFxxBDj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/20/2014 04:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> >> We're "only" talking about an optimisation here, even though a very >> useful one, so I wouldn't easily make compromises here. We should >> probably insist on using the node-name. Management tools need new code= >> anyway to make use of the new functionality, so they can implement >> node-name support as well while they're at it. >=20 > Using node-name is the best thing to do. >=20 > My concern is just whether libvirt and other management tools are > actually using node-name yet. Libvirt is not yet using it, but the more compelling we make it, the more libvirt will accelerate the efforts needed to start using node-name. I'm okay with requiring node-name here. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --dcVjnhcHU2JO6AmPGImVV10hkofFxxBDj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUboMEAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq7i8H/0Zm7LANb0yNiFGW+0kN6/Qv 1pTa5i0w3Hv+rEnBwzw2oAANRYYhz0IYR96GmDdgNJIB9hd0AA5hnPfVroI7AXHr RVAwXeFyDvwMHNTxJeHqI9VIin8eMM5lIplp+HUpYkwmWWIIviJNtChDk1fZJnFn BxaRNB+nDVZZrSORI7kYUNXTgVtWerBlRN5qzwBF/gLPMuB8qtPCCIQrE1OppEfj vmZWFsl9eYb4Nvcr5b3hrf2X93Y0CX5Enyce+2BgaB/NbfiLdOGnP3Kooc3+ItPB TPZFZSe61AhRUD7x0pXNQUSyk5klwy+93f8SwQcv3OsPuUsC/lCUKcuXn5xDf5U= =A4Lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dcVjnhcHU2JO6AmPGImVV10hkofFxxBDj--