From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xshhj-0005rO-NO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:40:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xshhd-0000wj-Eu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:40:35 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:49381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xshhd-0000wf-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:40:29 -0500 Message-ID: <54727E79.4040904@intel.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:40:25 +0800 From: "Chen, Tiejun" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1407836957-29098-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <20141123101047.GA3109@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20141123101047.GA3109@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/4] xen: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com On 2014/11/23 18:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:49:13PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: >> v5: >> >> * Simplify to make sure its really inherited from the standard one in patch #3 >> * Then drop the original patch #3 > > I carried > i440fx: make types configurable at run-time > pc_init1: pass parameters just with types > xen:hw:pci-host:piix: create host bridge to passthrough > qom-test: blacklist xenigd > xen:hw:i386:pc_piix: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough > > on my branch for a while now, but I'm not sure it's all still needed. They may not be necessary since you and Paolo already are fine to live without that separate machine specific to IGD passthrough. > If yes simply include these patches next time you repost the > patchset. Anyway, I will comment this point once I can issue next revision. Thanks for your reminder. Tiejun