From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtCFK-0002xW-Qc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:17:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtCFE-0002YM-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:17:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtCFE-0002YF-Eg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:17:12 -0500 Message-ID: <54744912.4020502@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:17:06 +0100 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1414478736-30064-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1414478736-30064-3-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1414478736-30064-3-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests/Makefile: Add check-block to make check List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= On 2014-10-28 at 07:45, Fam Zheng wrote: > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > --- > tests/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile > index 16f0e4c..f430b18 100644 > --- a/tests/Makefile > +++ b/tests/Makefile > @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ check-qapi-schema: $(patsubst %,check-%, $(check-qapi-schema-y)) > check-qtest: $(patsubst %,check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS)) > check-unit: $(patsubst %,check-%, $(check-unit-y)) > check-block: $(patsubst %,check-%, $(check-block-y)) > -check: check-qapi-schema check-unit check-qtest > +check: check-qapi-schema check-unit check-qtest check-block > check-clean: > $(MAKE) -C tests/tcg clean > rm -rf $(check-unit-y) tests/*.o $(QEMU_IOTESTS_HELPERS-y) Even regardless of patch 1: Reviewed-by: Max Reitz But we must fix 039 first (I remember some other test failing sometimes, but I can't remember which).