From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuLvk-000831-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:49:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuLvd-0003Zv-UP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:49:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuLvd-0003Zl-M8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:49:45 -0500 Message-ID: <54787D6B.5000302@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:31 +0100 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1417177604-21194-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> <4081425.dh6XptxTnn@wuerfel> <54787715.6030407@redhat.com> <20141128133300.GG25883@leverpostej> In-Reply-To: <20141128133300.GG25883@leverpostej> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [kernel PATCH] devicetree: document ARM bindings for QEMU's Firmware Config interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Rutland Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" On 11/28/14 14:33, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:22:29PM +0000, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 11/28/14 13:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> We don't normally list contiguous registers separately. Maybe just round >>> up to one page and make the register property >>> >>> reg = <0x0 0x9020000 0x0 0x1000>; >> >> The registers are not necessarily placed shoulder to shoulder (it's not >> a requirement in the QEMU source). > > It might not be at the moment, but if no-one separates them it could be > a requirement for using this binding. Is there any benefit to having > them separated? I couldn't name any. Thanks Laszlo