From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Iwan Budi Kusnanto <ibk@labhijau.net>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu coroutine behaviour on blocking send(3)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:15:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54788370.603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALv1wjHKqy5R=dMeB56ga_gfvoWjhOPNTeGctuH1KWFmBRvnJA@mail.gmail.com>
On 28/11/2014 14:46, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:55:00PM +0700, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote:
>>> I meant, does the coroutine will do yield internally when it get
>>> blocked on send(3)?
>>
>> No. In general, QEMU will use non-blocking file descriptors so the
>> blocking case does not apply. (You can't use blocking file descriptors
>> in an event loop without a risk of blocking the entire event loop.)
>>
>> There is qemu_co_send(), which attempts the non-blocking send(2) and
>> yields on EAGAIN.
>>
>> block/sheepdog.c and nbd.c both use this function. It's a little ugly
>> because the caller must add/remove the socket write fd handler function
>> so that the coroutine is re-entered when the fd becomes writable again.
>
> Thanks Stefan, it really helps.
I'll add that outgoing migration _does_ use blocking file descriptors.
But it runs in a separate thread and does not use coroutines.
Incoming migration, instead, uses coroutines, because it is not as
performance-intensive as outgoing migration and it's a bit easier to not
worry about thread-safety.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-28 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-28 6:50 [Qemu-devel] Qemu coroutine behaviour on blocking send(3) Iwan Budi Kusnanto
2014-11-28 6:55 ` Iwan Budi Kusnanto
2014-11-28 12:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-11-28 13:46 ` Iwan Budi Kusnanto
2014-11-28 14:15 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54788370.603@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ibk@labhijau.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).