From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xw7af-0003hu-MG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 05:55:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xw7aa-0004e1-4w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 05:55:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:63490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xw7aZ-0004cs-Vb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 05:55:20 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so19498972wgg.35 for ; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 02:55:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <547EEBC6.7090206@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:53:58 +0100 From: Eric Auger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1417544894-2000-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1417544894-2000-2-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <20141203104928.GF17502@cbox> In-Reply-To: <20141203104928.GF17502@cbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Update KVM headers from linux-next tag ToBeFilled List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoffer Dall Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, eric.auger@st.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, patches@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com On 12/03/2014 11:49 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:28:13PM +0000, Eric Auger wrote: >> Syncup KVM related linux headers from linux-next tree using >> scripts/update-linux-headers.sh. >> >> Add a new group/attribute in VGIC KVM device enabling to force >> vgic init: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL/KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger > > How can this be from linux-next? I'm pretty sure we didn't merge this > patch yet. Hi Christoffer, yes that's correct . I don't know how to format that kind of patch that refers to linux headers (I mentioned in the title tag ToBeFilled). I looked at other similar ones and I thought this was the wording that is generally used. I can move it to RFC but it will stay as is until kernel patches are upstreamed. In that case I should also move the QEMU VFIO patch back to RFC due to forwarding stuff;-) Best Regards Eric > > Also, if you synced your headers from your local tree, I think that > generally makes such a QEMU patches series an RFC one. > > -Christoffer >