From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Carew, Alan" <alan.carew@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/10] VM Power Management
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548B00B3.8040201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E29434AEE0C3A4180987AB476A6F6306D2B6443@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 12/12/2014 14:00, Carew, Alan wrote:
> The problem is deterministic control of host CPU frequency and the DPDK usage
> model.
> A hands-off power governor will scale based on workload, whether this is a host
> application or VM, so no problems or bug there.
>
> Where this solution fits is where an application wants to control its own
> power policy, for example l3fwd_power uses librte_power library to change
> frequency via apci_cpufreq based on application heuristics rather than
> relying on an inbuilt policy for example ondemand or performance.
>
> This ability has existed in DPDK for host usage for some time and VM power
> management allows this use case to be extended to cater for virtual machines
> by re-using the librte_power interface to encapsulate the VM->Host
> comms and provide an example means of managing such communications.
>
> I hope this clears it up a bit.
Ok, this looks specific enough that an out-of-band solution within DPDK
sounds like the best approach. It seems unnecessary to involve the
hypervisor (neither KVM nor QEMU).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-12 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1412003903-9061-1-git-send-email-alan.carew@intel.com>
[not found] ` <3349663.LNtcecTXb3@xps13>
[not found] ` <0E29434AEE0C3A4180987AB476A6F6306D2811AD@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <1804867.TWdiCQc2JQ@xps13>
[not found] ` <0E29434AEE0C3A4180987AB476A6F6306D28E7DF@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54C4BD63@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
2014-11-22 17:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/10] VM Power Management Vincent JARDIN
2014-12-09 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 23:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-12 13:00 ` Carew, Alan
2014-12-12 14:50 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-12-12 16:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-12 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548B00B3.8040201@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alan.carew@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).