From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/8] fw_cfg: max access size and region size are the same for MMIO data reg
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:40:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <549098D2.5020001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549090D8.5010006@redhat.com>
On 16/12/2014 21:06, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/16/14 20:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> fw_cfg_read (and
>> thus fw_cfg_data_mem_read) is not idempotent. The split/compose stuff
>> accesses the bytes at offsets 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 and composes them
>> according to the endianness.
>>
>> In the case of fw_cfg it just retrieves 8 bytes, but in the case of host
>> big endian it reads them in the "wrong" order for some reason (sorry, I
>> haven't looked at this thoroughly).
>
> I can't imagine how that would happen; fw_cfg_data_mem_read() ignores
> both "addr" and "size", and fw_cfg_read() simply advances the
> "cur_offset" member.
Honestly neither can I. But still the automatic splitting (which is
even tested by tests/endianness-test.c :)) assumes idempotency of the
components and it's not entirely surprising that it somehow/sometimes
breaks if you don't respect that.
>> So the solution is:
>>
>> 1) make fw_cfg_data_mem_ops DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>>
>> 2) make fw_cfg_data_mem_read and fw_cfg_data_mem_write call fw_cfg_read
>> and fw_cfg_write SIZE times and build up a value from the lowest byte up.
>
> Nonetheless, that's a really nice idea! I got so stuck with the
> automatic splitting that I forgot about the possibility to act upon the
> "size" parameter in fw_cfg_data_mem_read(). Thanks!
>
> ... Another thing that Andrew mentioned but I didn't cover in my other
> email -- what about fw_cfg_ctl_mem_ops? It's currently DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN.
>
> You flipped the combined ops to LE in commit 6fdf98f2 (and, apparently,
> I reviewed it). Shouldn't we do the same for the standalone selector?
No. The standalone selector is used as MMIO, and the BE platforms
expect the platform to be big-endian. The combined ops are only used on
ISA ports, where the firmware expects them to be little-endian (as
mentioned in the commit message).
That said, the standalone selector is used by BE platforms only, so we
know that the standalone selector is always DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN.
So if you want, you can make the standalone selector and the standalone
datum BE and swap them in the firmware. If the suggestion doesn't make
you jump up and down, I understand that. :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 15:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/8] fw_cfg, bootorder, and UEFI+'-kernel' on arm/virt Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/8] fw_cfg: max access size and region size are the same for MMIO data reg Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 13:48 ` Andrew Jones
2014-12-16 19:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 19:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-16 20:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 20:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 21:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-17 4:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 20:40 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-12-16 21:47 ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-17 5:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-17 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-17 9:31 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-16 20:41 ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-17 7:13 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-17 8:28 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-17 8:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/8] fw_cfg: generalize overlap check for combining control and data I/O ports Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/8] fw_cfg: introduce the "data_memwidth" property Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 12:06 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-16 12:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 16:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 17:10 ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-16 17:20 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-16 18:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/8] fw_cfg: expose the "data_memwidth" prop with fw_cfg_init_data_memwidth() Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/8] arm: add fw_cfg to "virt" board Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 6/8] hw/loader: split out load_image_gzipped_buffer() Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 7/8] hw/arm: pass pristine kernel image to guest firmware over fw_cfg Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-16 12:15 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-16 12:18 ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-16 12:20 ` Alexander Graf
2014-12-16 12:25 ` Peter Maydell
2014-12-16 12:42 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-12-16 12:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2014-12-12 15:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 8/8] hw/arm/virt: enable passing of EFI-stubbed kernel to guest UEFI firmware Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=549098D2.5020001@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).