From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6M7R-0006fd-VY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:27:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6M7O-0002TO-OV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:27:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6M7O-0002SE-Hn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:27:30 -0500 Message-ID: <54A423ED.3040606@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:27:25 +0100 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1420024880-15416-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> <54A3F829.4000509@redhat.com> <54A4032A.7050808@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: fix endianness in fw_cfg_data_mem_read() / _write() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu devel list , Paolo Bonzini , Drew Jones , Alexander Graf , Gerd Hoffmann On 12/31/14 16:17, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 31 December 2014 at 14:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Of course this also renders the issue mostly moot -- if none of us can >> test the code on a BE host, then that use case simply doesn't exist in >> practice. > > If you can give me a test image and a command line I can test > it on one of the PPC64 boxes in the GCC compile farm. Sorry for the late answer, I've been laying out stuff and uploading it (at 50KB/s :(). I'm very thankful for your help -- please see . Thanks! Laszlo