From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52845)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1Y6NYw-0003pv-Lo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:00:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1Y6NYs-0003kH-Hu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:00:02 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46812)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1Y6NYs-0003jl-9z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:59:58 -0500
Message-ID: <54A43993.7010508@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:59:47 +0100
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1420024880-15416-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com>
	<54A3F829.4000509@redhat.com> <54A4032A.7050808@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8Q0ZcutWRGbxJbgYvjvLXfdmi2GqRSD405749DFyfkJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<54A423ED.3040606@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8RfMg02A4p5NSrp7cjzGAcUAZ3pSGqz1vaqFmgtyHqHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA_DsbgsJzSnSKVao6s_Ku8hm1XKySnDDJVuVb775898JQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_DsbgsJzSnSKVao6s_Ku8hm1XKySnDDJVuVb775898JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: fix endianness in
	fw_cfg_data_mem_read() / _write()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 12/31/14 18:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 31 December 2014 at 17:17, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>> One thing I did notice in the dmesg:
>>
>> [   35.798423] alg: hash: Test 1 failed for sha1-ce
>> [   35.799135] 00000000: d3 5b 9a 85 7f 18 48 21 97 5c 12 72 a8 96 62 88
>> [   35.799815] 00000010: c3 d2 e1 f0
>> [   35.807121] alg: hash: Test 1 failed for sha224-ce
>> [   35.807458] 00000000: 75 49 49 85 18 97 6f 0c a7 d3 c3 ee 54 5d b3 59
>> [   35.807910] 00000010: a0 97 b3 34 f8 9c ab c1 91 e1 24 9e
>> [   35.814059] alg: hash: Test 1 failed for sha256-ce
>> [   35.814450] 00000000: b9 cb b3 d4 f5 29 fa 2c 8f 9b 8e 67 e9 6d 24 9b
>> [   35.814897] 00000010: 83 da e8 b1 ba 32 6c bb 4e 53 77 76 fc 11 e4 aa
>> [   35.827619] alg: cipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for aes-ce
>> [   35.828042] 00000000: ba 4a ec ea df 05 7d 76 56 af 92 77 5d 00 e0 90
>>
>> ...does that happen on little endian TCG hosts too, or do we have
>> a bug in our encryption emulation?
> 
> It doesn't happen on LE TCG hosts. Joy :-)

I think I agree, I repeated the test on my x86_64 laptop, and the only
"alg:" line I see is

[   39.286903] alg: No test for stdrng (krng)

Thanks
Laszlo