From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8too-00079f-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:50:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8toj-0005Pz-6V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:50:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8toi-0005Pt-NO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:50:44 -0500 Message-ID: <54AD63B0.4070103@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:49:52 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1416925057-692-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <54ACCE8B.1090701@redhat.com> <54AD12A0.70607@redhat.com> <54AD5EEA.8050401@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] relicense QEMU softfloat from 2b to to 2a List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Christophe Lyon , Patch Tracking , Richard Sandiford , Juan Quintela , QEMU Developers , Avi Kivity , Blue Swirl , Max Filippov , Paul Brook , Anthony Liguori , Stefan Weil , Guan Xuetao , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , Aurelien Jarno , Richard Henderson On 07/01/2015 17:34, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> >> # All Red Hat contributions (at least Avi, Juan, me; don't know about rth) >>> >> # are available under GPLv2+; also other authors agreed on it. For this >>> >> # particular license, >>> >> # Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini >>> >> >>> >> and Juan said: >>> >> # As said by paolo, any contribution by me is under GPLv2+ O:-) >>> >> >>> >> which I took to mean that the RH contribs were GPLv2+, not SF2a. >> > >> > I was not counting rth, because I don't know what he did on company time >> > and what he did on his own, and he's not on the virt team too. > Right, but I assumed when you said "this particular license" you > meant GPLv2+, not SF2a... Ah... For extra clarity what I meant was "strictly speaking RH contributors except possibly rth already have relicensed all their QEMU contributions under a license that is compatible with the rest of QEMU; but I am also okay with SF2a. Paolo