From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9WuY-0001SH-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 05:35:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9WuT-0002ie-D8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 05:35:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9WuT-0002hB-6m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 05:35:17 -0500 Message-ID: <54AFAED4.6050900@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:35:00 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1420799253-21911-1-git-send-email-frediano.ziglio@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1420799253-21911-1-git-send-email-frediano.ziglio@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] x86_64: optimise muldiv64 for x86_64 architecture List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Frediano Ziglio , Anthony Liguori , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Frediano Ziglio , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/01/2015 11:27, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio > --- > include/qemu-common.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/qemu-common.h b/include/qemu-common.h > index f862214..5366220 100644 > --- a/include/qemu-common.h > +++ b/include/qemu-common.h > @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static inline uint8_t from_bcd(uint8_t val) > } > > /* compute with 96 bit intermediate result: (a*b)/c */ > +#ifndef __x86_64__ > static inline uint64_t muldiv64(uint64_t a, uint32_t b, uint32_t c) > { > union { > @@ -392,6 +393,18 @@ static inline uint64_t muldiv64(uint64_t a, uint32_t b, uint32_t c) > res.l.low = (((rh % c) << 32) + (rl & 0xffffffff)) / c; > return res.ll; > } > +#else > +static inline uint64_t muldiv64(uint64_t a, uint32_t b, uint32_t c) > +{ > + uint64_t res; > + > + asm ("mulq %2\n\tdivq %3" > + : "=a"(res) > + : "a"(a), "qm"((uint64_t) b), "qm"((uint64_t)c) > + : "rdx", "cc"); > + return res; > +} > +#endif > Good idea. However, if you have __int128, you can just do return (__int128)a * b / c and the compiler should generate the right code. Conveniently, there is already CONFIG_INT128 that you can use. Paolo