From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9ZAD-0003Dt-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 07:59:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9ZAC-0001Ga-Bw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 07:59:41 -0500 Message-ID: <54AFD0AD.1000707@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:59:25 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1420765371-25342-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <54AFA7DD.1020803@redhat.com> <54AFCF42.1060206@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <54AFCF42.1060206@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] spapr_vio/spapr_iommu: Move VIO bypass where it belongs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , David Gibson On 09/01/2015 13:53, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> > I think the minimum version should be 2 as well, because migrating from >> > version 1 will not set the bypass field correctly. > This why the patch is "RFC" :) > > I can keep the flag in TCETable which would be a bit ugly but won't break > migration. Is there any better way to keep compatibility? No, I don't think so. Paolo