From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDC7x-00059q-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:12:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDC7t-0001p6-O1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:12:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDC7t-0001ot-Gi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:12:17 -0500 Message-ID: <54BD02A2.1060101@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:12:02 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150112115944.3504.66763.stgit@PASHA-ISP> <20150112120054.3504.35220.stgit@PASHA-ISP> <54B3BA89.6080705@redhat.com> <000501d02f12$61177b30$23467190$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <54B4E79C.5010201@redhat.com> <000101d03162$f2d2ed50$d878c7f0$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <54BCEFD1.5040702@redhat.com> <000c01d033df$ece29420$c6a7bc60$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <54BCF55D.7040607@redhat.com> <000d01d033e5$90d30420$b2790c60$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <54BCFF4E.408@redhat.com> <000e01d033e8$18a28e00$49e7aa00$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> <54BD006A.2080200@redhat.com> <000f01d033e9$3baf86e0$b30e94a0$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> In-Reply-To: <000f01d033e9$3baf86e0$b30e94a0$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v7 12/21] replay: recording and replaying clock ticks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Dovgaluk , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, mark.burton@greensocs.com, real@ispras.ru, batuzovk@ispras.ru, maria.klimushenkova@ispras.ru, afaerber@suse.de, fred.konrad@greensocs.com On 19/01/2015 14:10, Pavel Dovgaluk wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Because 'A' is written only inside some of the replay_run_event callbacks. >>> > > It depends on type of the event and it's processing function inside the QEMU core. >>> > > There could be no 'A' at all. >> > >> > Why can't that code write the 'E' as well? > Because such callbacks do not know that they are called from record/replay event. > They may be called from record/replay code and from other parts of QEMU. > And they may write save something low-level like timer request. I do not understand. Can you make an example with actual function names and data that is written? Paolo