From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDJjg-0006ko-0j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:19:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDJja-0003qs-T2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:19:47 -0500 Message-ID: <54BD7442.6010702@reactos.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:16:50 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIFBvdXNzaW5lYXU=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1421667328-11800-1-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> <1421667328-11800-3-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> <54BCFC57.3010709@redhat.com> <54BD1C2D.9070603@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <54BD1C2D.9070603@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] m48t59: add mem_base value to m48t59_init_isa() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , Artyom Tarasenko Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel , Alexander Graf Le 19/01/2015 16:01, Andreas F=C3=A4rber a =C3=A9crit : > Also, wasn't Herv=C3=A9's(?) plan to get rid of mem_base completely by = always > passing a pointer to ISADevice/ISABus around? It should only be needed > when somewhere NULL is being passed, no? Yes, I've a patch series which is removing the isa_mem_base variable. I'l= l send it on ML. ISA functions already take either a ISABus or a ISADevice, so they are go= od. Next step would be to allow multiple ISA busses in hw/isa/isa-bus.c Regards, Herv=C3=A9