From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36887) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEGz1-000310-3a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:35:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEGyv-0007ZY-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:35:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEGyv-0007ZG-5L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:35:29 -0500 Message-ID: <54C0EE89.7010907@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:35:21 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1420742303-3030-1-git-send-email-freddy77@gmail.com> <54BE59E4.7090600@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3] tests: rtl8139: test timers and interrupt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Frediano Ziglio Cc: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi On 22/01/2015 13:33, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > Hi, > sorry I didn't get everything. Was my patch/test fine or should I > change something? Your patch is ok as far as I'm concerned. > I saw you posted a patch for timer. Was your patch > tested with my code and you find some problems or was my patch that > had some problems? I found bugs in an earlier version of my patch, thanks to your test. (I hadn't submitted that patch because indeed I wasn't confident that it worked). So now that I tested it, I could submit it in good conscience! Paolo