From: Sebastian Macke <sebastian@macke.de>
To: Jia Liu <proljc@gmail.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, blue@cmd.nu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-openrisc: Add l.lwa/l.swa support
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:18:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C61467.3050805@macke.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJBMM-uhiOQrRwBK-FiVJK24DUyFWDh0eVbSujswU5C=Y13wqg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jia,
On 1/26/2015 10:50 AM, Jia Liu wrote:
> Hi Sebastian, Christian
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Sebastian Macke <sebastian@macke.de> wrote:
>> From: Christian Svensson <blue@cmd.nu>
>>
>> This patch adds support for atomic locks
>> and is an adaption from https://github.com/bluecmd/or1k-qemu/commits/or32-optimize
>>
>> Tested via the atomic lock implementation of musl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Svensson <blue@cmd.nu>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Macke <sebastian@macke.de>
>> ---
>> target-openrisc/cpu.h | 3 ++
>> target-openrisc/interrupt.c | 3 ++
>> target-openrisc/translate.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-openrisc/cpu.h b/target-openrisc/cpu.h
>> index 69b96c6..abdba75 100644
>> --- a/target-openrisc/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target-openrisc/cpu.h
>> @@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ typedef struct CPUOpenRISCState {
>> in solt so far. */
>> uint32_t btaken; /* the SR_F bit */
>>
>> + target_ulong lock_addr; /* Atomicity lock address. */
>> + target_ulong lock_value; /* Atomicity lock value. */
>> +
>> CPU_COMMON
>>
>> /* Fields from here on are preserved across CPU reset. */
>> diff --git a/target-openrisc/interrupt.c b/target-openrisc/interrupt.c
>> index e480cfd..68d554c 100644
>> --- a/target-openrisc/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/target-openrisc/interrupt.c
>> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ void openrisc_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>> env->tlb->cpu_openrisc_map_address_data = &cpu_openrisc_get_phys_nommu;
>> env->tlb->cpu_openrisc_map_address_code = &cpu_openrisc_get_phys_nommu;
>>
>> + /* invalidate lock */
>> + env->cpu_lock_addr = -1;
>> +
>> if (cs->exception_index > 0 && cs->exception_index < EXCP_NR) {
>> env->pc = (cs->exception_index << 8);
>> } else {
>> diff --git a/target-openrisc/translate.c b/target-openrisc/translate.c
>> index 543aa67..6401b4b 100644
>> --- a/target-openrisc/translate.c
>> +++ b/target-openrisc/translate.c
>> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ typedef struct DisasContext {
>> static TCGv_ptr cpu_env;
>> static TCGv cpu_sr;
>> static TCGv cpu_R[32];
>> +static TCGv cpu_lock_addr;
>> +static TCGv cpu_lock_value;
>> static TCGv cpu_pc;
>> static TCGv jmp_pc; /* l.jr/l.jalr temp pc */
>> static TCGv cpu_npc;
>> @@ -82,6 +84,12 @@ void openrisc_translate_init(void)
>> env_flags = tcg_global_mem_new_i32(TCG_AREG0,
>> offsetof(CPUOpenRISCState, flags),
>> "flags");
>> + cpu_lock_addr = tcg_global_mem_new(TCG_AREG0,
>> + offsetof(CPUOpenRISCState, lock_addr),
>> + "lock_addr");
>> + cpu_lock_value = tcg_global_mem_new(TCG_AREG0,
>> + offsetof(CPUOpenRISCState, lock_value),
>> + "lock_value");
>> cpu_pc = tcg_global_mem_new(TCG_AREG0,
>> offsetof(CPUOpenRISCState, pc), "pc");
>> cpu_npc = tcg_global_mem_new(TCG_AREG0,
>> @@ -254,17 +262,67 @@ static void gen_jump(DisasContext *dc, uint32_t imm, uint32_t reg, uint32_t op0)
>> gen_sync_flags(dc);
>> }
>>
>> +/* According to the OpenRISC specification we should poison our atomic lock
>> + * if any other store is detected to the same address. For the sake of speed
>> + * and because we're single-threaded we guarantee that atomic stores
>> + * fail only if an atomic load or another atomic store
>> + * is executed.
>> + *
>> + * To prevent the potential case of an ordinary store, we save
>> + * the *value* of the address at the lock time. */
>> +
>> +static void gen_atomic_load(TCGv tD, TCGv t0, DisasContext *dc)
>> +{
>> + tcg_gen_qemu_ld_tl(tD, t0, dc->mem_idx, MO_TEUL);
>> + tcg_gen_mov_i32(cpu_lock_addr, t0);
>> + tcg_gen_mov_i32(cpu_lock_value, tD);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gen_atomic_store(TCGv tB, TCGv t0, DisasContext *dc)
>> +{
>> + int store_fail;
>> + int store_done;
>> +
>> + store_fail = gen_new_label();
>> + store_done = gen_new_label();
>> +
>> + /* check address */
>> + tcg_gen_brcond_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t0, cpu_lock_addr, store_fail);
>> +
>> + /* check value */
>> + TCGv val = tcg_temp_new();
>> + tcg_gen_qemu_ld_tl(val, t0, dc->mem_idx, MO_TEUL);
>> + tcg_gen_brcond_i32(TCG_COND_NE, val, cpu_lock_value, store_fail);
>> + tcg_temp_free(val);
>> +
>> + /* success of atomic access */
>> + tcg_gen_qemu_st_tl(tB, t0, dc->mem_idx, MO_TEUL);
>> + tcg_gen_ori_tl(cpu_sr, cpu_sr, SR_F);
>> + tcg_gen_br(store_done);
>> +
>> + gen_set_label(store_fail);
>> + tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_sr, cpu_sr, ~SR_F);
>> +
>> + gen_set_label(store_done);
>> + /* the atomic store invalidates the lock address. */
>> + tcg_gen_movi_i32(cpu_lock_addr, -1);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void gen_loadstore(DisasContext *dc, uint32 op0,
>> uint32_t ra, uint32_t rb, uint32_t rd,
>> uint32_t offset)
>> {
>> TCGv t0 = cpu_R[ra];
>> if (offset != 0) {
>> - t0 = tcg_temp_new();
>> + t0 = tcg_temp_local_new();
>> tcg_gen_addi_tl(t0, cpu_R[ra], sign_extend(offset, 16));
>> }
>>
>> switch (op0) {
>> + case 0x1b: /* l.lwa */
>> + gen_atomic_load(cpu_R[rd], t0, dc);
>> + break;
>> +
>> case 0x21: /* l.lwz */
>> tcg_gen_qemu_ld_tl(cpu_R[rd], t0, dc->mem_idx, MO_TEUL);
>> break;
>> @@ -289,6 +347,10 @@ static void gen_loadstore(DisasContext *dc, uint32 op0,
>> tcg_gen_qemu_ld_tl(cpu_R[rd], t0, dc->mem_idx, MO_TESW);
>> break;
>>
>> + case 0x33: /* l.swa */
>> + gen_atomic_store(cpu_R[rb], t0, dc);
>> + break;
>> +
>> case 0x35: /* l.sw */
>> tcg_gen_qemu_st_tl(cpu_R[rb], t0, dc->mem_idx, MO_TEUL);
>> break;
>> @@ -759,9 +821,6 @@ static void dec_calc(DisasContext *dc, uint32_t insn)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -
>> -
>> -
> It should be blank lines in here in [patch 1/2].
Yes, looks like I added three lines in patch 1/2 and then removed them
in patch 2/2.
I guess if both patches are accepted it does not matter. Otherwise I
will fix these in revision 2.
>
>> static void dec_misc(DisasContext *dc, uint32_t insn)
>> {
>> uint32_t op0, op1;
>> @@ -905,6 +964,11 @@ static void dec_misc(DisasContext *dc, uint32_t insn)
>> gen_loadstore(dc, op0, ra, rb, rd, I16);
>> #endif*/
>>
>> + case 0x1b: /* l.lwa */
>> + LOG_DIS("l.lwa r%d, r%d, %d\n", rd, ra, I16);
>> + gen_loadstore(dc, op0, ra, rb, rd, I16);
>> + break;
>> +
> Is it a new instruction new added into OpenRISC?
Yes, they were added last year.
http://opencores.org/websvn,filedetails?repname=openrisc&path=%2Fopenrisc%2Ftrunk%2Fdocs%2Fopenrisc-arch-1.1-rev0.pdf
Previously the kernel handled those atomic calls for single core
implementations.
But we also managed to run multi-core OpenRISC machine. And here the
instructions are absolutely necessary.
Fact is, that almost none of our toolchains work anymore without these
new instructions.
>> case 0x21: /* l.lwz */
>> LOG_DIS("l.lwz r%d, r%d, %d\n", rd, ra, I16);
>> gen_loadstore(dc, op0, ra, rb, rd, I16);
>> @@ -1072,6 +1136,11 @@ static void dec_misc(DisasContext *dc, uint32_t insn)
>> gen_loadstore(dc, op0, ra, rb, rd, tmp);
>> #endif*/
>>
>> + case 0x33: /* l.swa */
>> + LOG_DIS("l.swa %d, r%d, r%d, %d\n", I5, ra, rb, I11);
>> + gen_loadstore(dc, op0, ra, rb, rd, tmp);
>> + break;
>> +
>> case 0x35: /* l.sw */
>> LOG_DIS("l.sw %d, r%d, r%d, %d\n", I5, ra, rb, I11);
>> gen_loadstore(dc, op0, ra, rb, rd, tmp);
>> --
>> 2.2.2
>>
> Regards,
> Jia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-25 10:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-openrisc: Add atomic instructions Sebastian Macke
2015-01-25 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] target-openrisc: Separate of load/store instructions Sebastian Macke
2015-01-26 9:47 ` Jia Liu
2015-01-25 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-openrisc: Add l.lwa/l.swa support Sebastian Macke
2015-01-26 9:50 ` Jia Liu
2015-01-26 10:15 ` Christian Svensson
2015-01-26 10:18 ` Sebastian Macke [this message]
2015-01-28 2:28 ` Jia Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C61467.3050805@macke.de \
--to=sebastian@macke.de \
--cc=blue@cmd.nu \
--cc=proljc@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).