From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGGim-00008J-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:43:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGGij-0002ho-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:43:04 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:29466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGGij-0002hb-AN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:43:01 -0500 Message-ID: <54C83090.2080202@intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:42:56 +0800 From: "Chen, Tiejun" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1421824792-3925-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <21695.36752.122911.770104@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1421848132.11160.44.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <54C0498D.1030603@intel.com> <54C19936.1060804@intel.com> <54C58DF2.2090509@intel.com> <21703.41796.519916.252197@mariner.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <21703.41796.519916.252197@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ian Jackson , Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2015/1/27 22:40, Ian Jackson wrote: > Chen, Tiejun writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough"): >> On 2015/1/23 8:43, Chen, Tiejun wrote: >>> On 2015/1/22 8:51, Chen, Tiejun wrote: >>>> At this point I just concern here if we still use 'gfx_passthrou', at >>>> least it may look like a backward compatibility with older versions of >>>> qemu in Xen side, qemu-xen-traditional. But I'd like to follow your >>>> final option. > ... >>> Any feedback to this option I should follow here? >> >> Ping... > > I think this is a question that qemu upstream should answer. > Actually this is just commented by Gerd in qemu upstream. So now looks in Xen side you guys don't have any objection to use 'igd-passthru' as well. If yes, I'm fine to adopt this. Thanks Tiejun