From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGmpL-0006JP-Kt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:00:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGmpH-000840-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:59:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGmpH-00083s-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:59:55 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0TAxsiJ005623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:59:54 -0500 Message-ID: <54CA12A7.4050702@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:59:51 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1422300468-16216-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <1422300468-16216-5-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <54C6A622.9010902@redhat.com> <54C6A6E4.8060000@redhat.com> <54C6AD3D.60808@redhat.com> <54C6AE02.4030105@redhat.com> <54C6B006.9000607@redhat.com> <54C95D44.2060104@redhat.com> <54C9690E.7040701@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54C9690E.7040701@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/21] block: Add bdrv_close_all() handlers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz , Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi On 28/01/2015 23:56, Max Reitz wrote: > Somehow I lost track of that final detail (I blame Christmas and New > Year), so that's indeed what we decided upon. I will implement it in v2 > (an eject notifier for BBs, which is then used by NBD). Yeah, I was thinking again about it and an eject notifier really sounds like the best plan. Paolo