From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9vj-0004fI-1l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:40:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9vd-0000U7-LR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:40:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9vd-0000Tm-F3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:40:01 -0500 Message-ID: <54CB6D8C.7080008@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:39:56 +0100 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54CA6CF6.7090308@redhat.com> <54CA7BF5.8020800@redhat.com> <54CA8637.2080306@redhat.com> <54CA8E37.8070009@redhat.com> <20150130095456.GB27572@redhat.com> <20150130104833.GC27572@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] address order of virtio-mmio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: qemu devel list On 01/30/15 11:54, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 January 2015 at 10:48, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> Long term though it will be much better of AArch64 would just do PCI >> instead of MMIO bus. Then we have proper device addressing which we >> can control in a predictable manner that will be stable across hotplug >> and unplug and migration. I hear there's work on PCI for AArch64 but >> is there a near term ETA yet ? > > I need to review Alex's v3 patchset; if it doesn't have any issues > it'll probably go into target-arm.next next week and hit mainline > shortly after that. (And then a root bridge driver for it will be necessary in edk2. (I'm unsure if the guest kernel driver is already being worked on.)) Thanks Laszlo