From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHInT-0005d3-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:08:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHInO-0002Lo-0O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:08:11 -0500 Received: from mx-v6.kamp.de ([2a02:248:0:51::16]:35405 helo=mx01.kamp.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHInN-0002LC-K7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:08:05 -0500 Message-ID: <54CBF2B2.20703@kamp.de> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:08:02 +0100 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] value of VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Kevin Wolf , ming.lei@canonical.com, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Hi, Just wondering if VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE in include/hw/virtio/virtio.h should not be equal to IOV_MAX instead of the hardcoded 1024? Thanks, Peter