From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@parallels.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: introduce BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:29:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D0CD54.9080309@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422965567-8611-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
On 03/02/15 15:12, Peter Lieven wrote:
> we check and adjust request sizes at several places with
> sometimes inconsistent checks or default values:
> INT_MAX
> INT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS
> UINT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS
> SIZE_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS
>
> This patches introdocues a macro for the maximal allowed sectors
> per request and uses it at several places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> ---
> block.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 4 ++--
> include/block/block.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 8272ef9..4e58b35 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ static int bdrv_check_byte_request(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
> static int bdrv_check_request(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> int nb_sectors)
> {
> - if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > INT_MAX / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> + if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS) {
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> @@ -2758,7 +2758,7 @@ static int bdrv_rw_co(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *buf,
> .iov_len = nb_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
> };
>
> - if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > INT_MAX / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> + if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS) {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -2826,13 +2826,10 @@ int bdrv_make_zero(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
> }
>
> for (;;) {
> - nb_sectors = target_sectors - sector_num;
> + nb_sectors = MIN(target_sectors - sector_num, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
> if (nb_sectors <= 0) {
> return 0;
> }
> - if (nb_sectors > INT_MAX / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> - nb_sectors = INT_MAX / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> - }
> ret = bdrv_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors, &n);
> if (ret < 0) {
> error_report("error getting block status at sector %" PRId64 ": %s",
> @@ -3167,7 +3164,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_readv(BlockDriverState *bs,
> int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov,
> BdrvRequestFlags flags)
> {
> - if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > (UINT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)) {
> + if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS) {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -3202,8 +3199,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
> struct iovec iov = {0};
> int ret = 0;
>
> - int max_write_zeroes = bs->bl.max_write_zeroes ?
> - bs->bl.max_write_zeroes : INT_MAX;
> + int max_write_zeroes = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_write_zeroes,
> + BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
>
> while (nb_sectors > 0 && !ret) {
> int num = nb_sectors;
> @@ -3458,7 +3455,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_writev(BlockDriverState *bs,
> int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov,
> BdrvRequestFlags flags)
> {
> - if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > (INT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)) {
> + if (nb_sectors < 0 || nb_sectors > BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS) {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -5120,7 +5117,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - max_discard = bs->bl.max_discard ? bs->bl.max_discard : INT_MAX;
> + max_discard = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_discard, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
> while (nb_sectors > 0) {
> int ret;
> int num = nb_sectors;
> diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> index 8c51a29..1a8a176 100644
> --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ void virtio_blk_submit_multireq(BlockBackend *blk, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
> }
>
> max_xfer_len = blk_get_max_transfer_length(mrb->reqs[0]->dev->blk);
> - max_xfer_len = MIN_NON_ZERO(max_xfer_len, INT_MAX);
> + max_xfer_len = MIN_NON_ZERO(max_xfer_len, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
>
> qsort(mrb->reqs, mrb->num_reqs, sizeof(*mrb->reqs),
> &multireq_compare);
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static bool virtio_blk_sect_range_ok(VirtIOBlock *dev,
> uint64_t nb_sectors = size >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> uint64_t total_sectors;
>
> - if (nb_sectors > INT_MAX) {
> + if (nb_sectors > BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS) {
> return false;
> }
> if (sector & dev->sector_mask) {
> diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
> index 3082d2b..25a6d62 100644
> --- a/include/block/block.h
> +++ b/include/block/block.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ typedef enum {
> #define BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE (1ULL << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
> #define BDRV_SECTOR_MASK ~(BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE - 1)
>
> +#define BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS MIN(SIZE_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, \
> + INT_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
> +
> /*
> * Allocation status flags
> * BDRV_BLOCK_DATA: data is read from bs->file or another file
Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
On the other hand the limitation to INT_MAX for a request size
(in bytes) is here.
bdrv_check_byte_request
if (size > INT_MAX) {
return -EIO;
}
which means that all my patches from series
[PATCH v3 0/2] fix max_discard for NBD/gluster block drivers
becomes unnecessary but this was not that obvious before this
clarification :)
Den
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-03 12:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: introduce BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS Peter Lieven
2015-02-03 13:29 ` Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2015-02-03 14:30 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-03 15:33 ` Denis V. Lunev
2015-02-06 8:49 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-06 9:09 ` Denis V. Lunev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D0CD54.9080309@parallels.com \
--to=den@parallels.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).