From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Universal encryption on QEMU I/O channels
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:46:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D24CC9.2090100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150204152623.GA3032@redhat.com>
On 04/02/2015 16:26, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > GIOChannel's advantage is that---even though it may not be used for
> > regular migration---integration with chardev would be really easy.
>
> If we did a QEMUIOChannel that was basically the same as IOChannel, but
> with support for iovec writev/readv it'd mostly be drop-in replacement
> for the chardev code I guess.
Alternatively, QEMUIOChannel could be a very thin wrapper around GIOChannel.
If the QEMUIOChannel is created with qemu_io_channel_unix_get_fd, the
QEMUIOChannel could use g_io_channel_unix_get_fd to do writev/readv;
otherwise it would just use compatibility code.
This relieves you from having to rewrite all the Win32 code that glib
already has.
> So that version of GIO, with the glib-networking addon
> to provide TLS, would mean only running on RHEL-7, which feels like it
> is so new it would likely be a showstopper.
As long as the non-TLS stuff works on older distros, that would be okay
for me. Personally I don't care if VNC-TLS regresses on older distros,
either.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 11:32 [Qemu-devel] RFC: Universal encryption on QEMU I/O channels Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 13:00 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 13:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 14:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 14:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 15:11 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 15:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 15:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 16:46 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-02-05 14:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-02-05 14:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-02-05 14:45 ` Peter Maydell
2015-02-04 13:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-02-04 13:55 ` Peter Maydell
2015-02-04 16:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-02-04 16:41 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 20:41 ` Peter Maydell
2015-02-04 21:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-05 7:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-02-04 13:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-02-04 14:02 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 14:48 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 14:50 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-02-04 18:34 ` Eric Blake
2015-02-05 9:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-02-04 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 14:37 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-03-06 17:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D24CC9.2090100@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).