From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, mst@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
agraf@suse.de, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, scottwood@freescale.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, leon.alrae@imgtec.com, aurelien@aurel32.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] machine: query machine properties rather than qemu opts
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:45:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D276F4.7050400@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423064635-19045-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
Am 04.02.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum:
> Commit e79d5a6 ("machine: remove qemu_machine_opts global list") removed option
> descriptions from the -machine QemuOptsList to avoid repeating MachineState's QOM properties.
>
> This results in a Qemu crash if a non string option is queried using qemu opts.
> Fix this by querying machine properties through designated wrappers.
>
> I hope I didn't miss anything.
> Comments are appreciated as always.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcel
>
> Marcel Apfelbaum (8):
> machine: query iommu machine property rather than qemu opts
> hw/machine: kernel-irqchip property support for allowed/required
> machine: query kernel-irqchip machine property rather than qemu opts
> kvm: add machine state to kvm_arch_init
> machine: query kvm-shadow-mem machine property rather than qemu opts
> machine: query phandle-start machine property rather than qemu opts
> machine: query dump-guest-core machine property rather than qemu opts
> machine: query mem-merge machine property rather than qemu opts
In general this seems to work.
I have a question, though:
What I like is a way to do some wrappers in the specific machines.
For example, we plan to add
static inline void s390_machine_initfn(Object *obj)
{
object_property_add_bool(obj, "aes-key-wrap",
machine_get_aes_key_wrap,
machine_set_aes_key_wrap, NULL);
object_property_set_description(obj, "aes-key-wrap",
"enable/disable AES key wrapping using the CPACF wrapping key",
NULL);
object_property_add_bool(obj, "dea-key-wrap",
machine_get_dea_key_wrap,
machine_set_dea_key_wrap, NULL);
object_property_set_description(obj, "dea-key-wrap",
"enable/disable DEA key wrapping using the CPACF wrapping key",
NULL);
}
Previously we used
if (qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "aes-key-wrap", false))
if target-s390/kvm.c
to query that.
Now, these options are pretty specific to s390 and adding them to hw/core/machine.c
to create wrappers seems strange. So implementing them in hw/s390/s390-virtio-ccw.c
seems a much better place.
Would a function there that does gets S390_CCW_MACHINE(current_machine)->aes_key_wrap
considered ok, or do we need to pollute hw/core/machine.c with architecture specific
options?
Christian
PS: The same is somewhat true for qemu-options.hx. Having such specific machine option
in the global help offers room for improvement
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 15:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] machine: query machine properties rather than qemu opts Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] machine: query iommu machine property " Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 16:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-02-04 19:30 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-05 8:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-11 14:43 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] hw/machine: kernel-irqchip property support for allowed/required Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] machine: query kernel-irqchip machine property rather than qemu opts Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:41 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] kvm: add machine state to kvm_arch_init Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] machine: query kvm-shadow-mem machine property rather than qemu opts Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:37 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] machine: query phandle-start " Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:32 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:34 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-11 14:48 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] machine: query dump-guest-core " Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-10 17:50 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-10 21:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-10 21:36 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-11 7:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-11 8:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-11 9:42 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 8:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-11 11:06 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-11 13:04 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-11 15:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-11 9:44 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-11 14:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 15:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] machine: query mem-merge " Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-10 15:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-10 16:22 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 16:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] machine: query machine properties " Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 19:45 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-02-04 21:35 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-02-04 22:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-25 11:55 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-04 15:37 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D276F4.7050400@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=leon.alrae@imgtec.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).