qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guang Chen <chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:22:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D37C95.3060101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423107872-3268-2-git-send-email-chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 2015-02-04 at 22:44, Xiao Guang Chen wrote:
> This patch fixes an io test suite issue that was introduced with the
> commit c88930a6866e74953e931ae749781e98e486e5c8 'qemu-char: Permit only
> a single "stdio" character device'. The option supresses the creation of
> default devices.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guang Chen <chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common        | 1 +
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common.config | 2 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common.qemu   | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I think this patch and patch 3 are fine, but there is no reason not to 
squash 3 into 1. The reason I'm suggesting that once again is that it 
prevents tests 067, 071, and 087 from breaking (which would be a really 
nice thing).

So if you decide not to squash them I'll probably give an Reviewed-by 
anyway, but you really should consider doing it.

Max

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-05 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05  3:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 0/6] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05  3:52   ` Fam Zheng
2015-02-05  5:52     ` chen xiao guang
2015-02-05 14:22   ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 2/6] qemu-iotests: qemu machine type support Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 14:18   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05 17:57     ` Eric Blake
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 3/6] qemu-iotests: fix tests 067, 071 and 087 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 4/6] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 041 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 14:26   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 5/6] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 051 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 15:11   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-09  8:06     ` chen xiao guang
2015-02-09 14:35       ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 6/6] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 055 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 15:16   ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D37C95.3060101@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).