From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJbzR-00078G-LB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 01:02:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJbzN-000441-Qj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 01:02:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]:35222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJbzN-00043m-JZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 01:02:01 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id eu11so15152018pac.2 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:02:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <54D458D4.8080303@twiddle.net> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:01:56 -0800 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54D41E4D.6030603@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Intel X86 hardware transactional memory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Xin Tong Cc: QEMU Developers , Patrick Williams III On 02/05/2015 07:36 PM, Xin Tong wrote: > I agree conflict detection should be down on physical addresses. we do > have physical addresses in the softmmu helpers. On a side note, is > there a plan to be provide a set of functionalities in QEMU to make > implementing transactional memory easier ? No one is working on it that I know of. r~