From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL75j-0004AY-Su for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:26:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL75f-0006S6-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:26:47 -0500 Received: from mx-v6.kamp.de ([2a02:248:0:51::16]:49857 helo=mx01.kamp.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL75f-0006R8-FT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:26:43 -0500 Message-ID: <54D9CEC9.9040902@kamp.de> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:26:33 +0100 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] kvmclock_current_nsec: Assertion `time.tsc_timestamp <= migration_tsc' List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , mtosatti@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de Hi, while migrating vServers from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 I see the following assertion that seems to have been introduced between 2.1.0 and 2.2.0 trigger on the destination. This happens in a serious amount of cases. In most cases it works flawlessly on the second attempt to migrate the vServer (same source and same destination). Any hints how to debug the root cause? Thank you, Peter