From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kvmclock_current_nsec: Assertion `time.tsc_timestamp <= migration_tsc'
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:30:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D9DDAF.2050200@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D9DCB0.8030407@redhat.com>
Am 10.02.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
> On 10/02/2015 11:24, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> First of all (but unrelated to the bug) do not use "-cpu qemu64" with
>>> KVM.
>> I remember there was an issue with kvm64 anytime in the past, but this
>> is ages ago I think. I will change that for new vserver starts. What
>> (which flag) is the exact issue with qemu64 vs. kvm64
> QEMU64 does not resemble any actual processor. You want the lowest
> denominator of your cluster, probably Nehalem.
Ah okay. Normally, I compare the available cpu flags of my cluster
and pass those flags individually. Maybe I have to revisit that logic.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-10 9:26 [Qemu-devel] kvmclock_current_nsec: Assertion `time.tsc_timestamp <= migration_tsc' Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 9:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 10:03 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 10:24 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 10:30 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2015-02-10 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 10:27 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 10:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-02-10 12:17 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 12:56 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 13:31 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 13:58 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-10 14:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-12 15:31 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D9DDAF.2050200@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).