From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLB39-0001vp-Ro for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:40:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLB32-0001aN-QN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:40:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLB32-0001a7-J1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:40:16 -0500 Message-ID: <54DA0A34.7030109@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:40:04 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54D9CEC9.9040902@kamp.de> <20150210105038.GA32350@amt.cnet> <54D9F6EC.5080807@kamp.de> <54D9FB2A.9020604@redhat.com> <54DA001B.9030900@kamp.de> <54DA045E.7000801@redhat.com> <54DA0829.2020302@kamp.de> In-Reply-To: <54DA0829.2020302@kamp.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kvmclock_current_nsec: Assertion `time.tsc_timestamp <= migration_tsc' List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , agraf@suse.de On 10/02/2015 14:31, Peter Lieven wrote: >>> >> Yes, but it is still not ready. It only works with 3.18 and 3.16. > > Okay, but for testing I will use 3.19 with the patch for testing if the > assertion disappears?! If you use 3.19 in the host, you don't need kvm-kmod. If you use 3.19 with kvm-kmod, you can use origin/next but only if your host kernel is 3.16 or 3.18. Paolo