From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block: move I/O request processing to block/io.c
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:12:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E3687D.3050309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424183959-16897-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3040 bytes --]
On 02/17/2015 07:39 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The block.c file has grown to over 6000 lines. It is time to split this
> file so there are fewer conflicts and the code is easier to maintain.
>
> Extract I/O request processing code:
> * Read
> * Write
> * Zero writes and making the image empty
> * Flush
> * Discard
> * ioctl
> * Tracked requests and queuing
> * Throttling and copy-on-read
> * Block status and allocated functions
> * Refreshing block limits
> * Reading/writing vmstate
> * qemu_blockalign() and friends
>
> The patch simply moves code from block.c into block/io.c.
>
> No code changes are made except adding the following block_int.h
> functions so they can be called across block.c and block/io.c:
> bdrv_set_dirty(), bdrv_reset_dirty().
I spotted a couple of other changes that you may not have intended (or
if you did, you should also call them out here).
>
> I/O request processing needs to set up BlockDriver coroutine and AIO
> emulation function pointers, so add bdrv_setup_io_funcs(bdrv) interface
> that block.c calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> This patch is based on the last block pull request from Fri 13th February 2015.
> This is necessary since the patch is prone to conflicts in block.c - we need to
> use the latest code!
>
> If anyone wants to move more stuff, please consider sending follow-up patches
> instead because it is painful to rebase this.
>
> v2:
> * Move bdrv_drain_all() [Kevin]
> * Move bdrv_make_zero() [Kevin]
> * Move bdrv_flush_all() [Kevin]
> * Move bdrv_is_allocated/get_block_status family of functions [Kevin]
> * Move bdrv_refresh_limits() [Kevin]
> * Move load/save_vmstate() [Kevin]
> * Move qemu_blockalign() and friends [Kevin]
> -void bdrv_drain_all(void)
> -{
> - /* Always run first iteration so any pending completion BHs run */
> - bool busy = true;
> - BlockDriverState *bs;
> -
> - while (busy) {
> - busy = false;
> -
> - QTAILQ_FOREACH(bs, &bdrv_states, device_list) {
> - AioContext *aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
> -
> +void bdrv_drain_all(void)
> +{
> + /* Always run first iteration so any pending completion BHs run */
> + bool busy = true;
> + BlockDriverState *bs = NULL;
> +
> + while (busy) {
> + busy = false;
> +
> + while ((bs = bdrv_next(bs))) {
> + AioContext *aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
> +
You switched iteration from QTAILQ_FOREACH to a while(bdrv_next()) loop,
here, and in bdrv_flush_all.
I think the change is safe, but it would be smarter to split it into a
separate patch and/or document it in the commit message as intentional.
But I also agree that we want this patch in sooner rather than later to
minimize conflict churn. So:
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 14:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block: move I/O request processing to block/io.c Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-02-17 16:12 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2015-02-18 10:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E3687D.3050309@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).