From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, carnold@suse.com, jcody@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block/vpc: simplify vpc_read
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:29:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EB7177.9040801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424701661-21241-3-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
On 2015-02-23 at 09:27, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> ---
> block/vpc.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/vpc.c b/block/vpc.c
> index 326c2bb..4e5ba85 100644
> --- a/block/vpc.c
> +++ b/block/vpc.c
> @@ -497,40 +497,70 @@ static int vpc_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int vpc_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> - uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
> +static int64_t coroutine_fn vpc_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> + int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
How about just putting the function header here? If you really have to
move vpc_co_get_block_status() up, I'd rather like it to be in a
separate patch.
Second, while apparently vpc_read() is actually called in a coroutine,
that is pretty hard to know. Most importantly, it's not marked as a
coroutine_fn. Therefore I don't think it's a good idea to call
vpc_co_get_block_status() directly; I'd vote for either using
bdrv_get_block_status(), or moving the content of
vpc_co_get_block_status() to a non-coroutine_fn (it doesn't contain an
coroutine-related function calls, so this is fine) and then making
vpc_co_get_block_status() a wrapper around that, or just dropping this
patch.
The latter I'm proposing because I don't really see what this patch
improves. The previous vpc_read() function was pretty straightforward,
too, and I don't think it was unbearably longer.
One could argue that the coroutine_fn stuff doesn't really matter in
this situation because it doesn't actually do anything right now and
vpc_co_get_block_status() does not call any other coroutine_fn functions
in turn; however, it is a semantic contract established by
include/block/coroutine.h and as far as I remember, Stefan did
eventually want to have something to error out on compile-time if a
non-coroutine_fn function calls a coroutine_fn. I don't like breaking
this contract even if it's not bad in this specific case.
Considering you probably think bdrv_get_block_status() to be too much
overhead (it will fall down to the protocol layer on VHD_FIXED) and you
probably find making vpc_read() shorter justified (again, which I don't
necessarily), I think moving the contents of vpc_co_get_block_status()
to a non-coroutine_fn might be the best way to go.
> {
> BDRVVPCState *s = bs->opaque;
> - int ret;
> - int64_t offset;
> - int64_t sectors, sectors_per_block;
> - VHDFooter *footer = (VHDFooter *) s->footer_buf;
> + VHDFooter *footer = (VHDFooter*) s->footer_buf;
> + int64_t start, offset;
> + bool allocated;
> + int n;
>
> if (be32_to_cpu(footer->type) == VHD_FIXED) {
> - return bdrv_read(bs->file, sector_num, buf, nb_sectors);
> + *pnum = nb_sectors;
> + return BDRV_BLOCK_RAW | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
> + (sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> }
> - while (nb_sectors > 0) {
> - offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
>
> - sectors_per_block = s->block_size >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> - sectors = sectors_per_block - (sector_num % sectors_per_block);
> - if (sectors > nb_sectors) {
> - sectors = nb_sectors;
> + offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> + start = offset;
> + allocated = (offset != -1);
> + *pnum = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + /* All sectors in a block are contiguous (without using the bitmap) */
> + n = ROUND_UP(sector_num + 1, s->block_size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)
> + - sector_num;
> + n = MIN(n, nb_sectors);
> +
> + *pnum += n;
> + sector_num += n;
> + nb_sectors -= n;
> +
> + if (allocated) {
> + return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start;
> }
> + if (nb_sectors == 0) {
> + break;
> + }
> + offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> + } while (offset == -1);
>
> - if (offset == -1) {
> - memset(buf, 0, sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> - } else {
> - ret = bdrv_pread(bs->file, offset, buf,
> - sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> - if (ret != sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vpc_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> + uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
> +{
> + int ret, n;
> + int64_t ret2;
> +
> + while (nb_sectors > 0) {
> + ret2 = vpc_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors, &n);
> +
Superfluous whitespace here.
> + if (ret2 & BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID) {
> + ret = bdrv_pread(bs->file, ret2 & BDRV_SECTOR_MASK, buf,
> + n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> + if (ret != n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> return -1;
Please make that "return ret" (and possibly "if (ret < 0)", if you want to).
Max
> }
> + } else {
> + memset(buf, 0x00, n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> }
>
> - nb_sectors -= sectors;
> - sector_num += sectors;
> - buf += sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> + sector_num += n;
> + nb_sectors -= n;
> + buf += n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -597,48 +627,6 @@ static coroutine_fn int vpc_co_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int64_t coroutine_fn vpc_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> - int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
> -{
> - BDRVVPCState *s = bs->opaque;
> - VHDFooter *footer = (VHDFooter*) s->footer_buf;
> - int64_t start, offset;
> - bool allocated;
> - int n;
> -
> - if (be32_to_cpu(footer->type) == VHD_FIXED) {
> - *pnum = nb_sectors;
> - return BDRV_BLOCK_RAW | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
> - (sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> - }
> -
> - offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> - start = offset;
> - allocated = (offset != -1);
> - *pnum = 0;
> -
> - do {
> - /* All sectors in a block are contiguous (without using the bitmap) */
> - n = ROUND_UP(sector_num + 1, s->block_size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)
> - - sector_num;
> - n = MIN(n, nb_sectors);
> -
> - *pnum += n;
> - sector_num += n;
> - nb_sectors -= n;
> -
> - if (allocated) {
> - return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start;
> - }
> - if (nb_sectors == 0) {
> - break;
> - }
> - offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> - } while (offset == -1);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Calculates the number of cylinders, heads and sectors per cylinder
> * based on a given number of sectors. This is the algorithm described
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-23 14:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] block/vpc optimizations Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block/vpc: optimize vpc_co_get_block_status Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:08 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24 6:41 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block/vpc: simplify vpc_read Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:29 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-02-24 6:44 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:09 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vpc: Ignore geometry for large images Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:34 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24 6:45 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:12 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block/vpc: make calculate_geometry spec conform Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:59 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24 6:49 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:14 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block/vpc: rename footer->size -> footer->current_size Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 19:04 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54EB7177.9040801@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=carnold@suse.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).