qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, carnold@suse.com, jcody@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vpc: Ignore geometry for large images
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:12:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EC86E7.40406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EC1E08.4030205@kamp.de>

On 2015-02-24 at 01:45, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 23.02.2015 um 19:34 schrieb Max Reitz:
>> On 2015-02-23 at 09:27, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> The CHS calculation as done per the VHD spec imposes a maximum image
>>> size of ~127 GB. Real VHD images exist that are larger than that.
>>>
>>> Apparently there are two separate non-standard ways to achieve this:
>>> You could use more heads than the spec does - this is the option that
>>> qemu-img create chooses.
>>>
>>> However, other images exist where the geometry is set to the maximum
>>> (65536/16/255), but the actual image size is larger. Until now, such

Notice just now: This should be 65535/16/255.

>>> images are truncated at 127 GB when opening them with qemu.
>>>
>>> This patch changes the vpc driver to ignore geometry in this case and
>>> only trust the size field in the header.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   block/vpc.c |   10 ++++------
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> I'm trusting you this works for disk2vhd; at least it's in accordance 
>> with the VHD specification.
>
> When I wrote the hack for disk2vhd some time ago I just found that the 
> reported size was too big.
> I was not aware that it was exactly this special value.
>
> You say in the specs. Do you have a spec that is actually stating that 
> (65536/16/255) is special
> value that says ignore CHS and look at the footer?

No, but I do have a spec that says "if the number of sectors is greater 
than 65535 * 16 * 255, clamp it to 65535 * 16 * 255 for the geometry 
calculation". This implies to me that this value means that one cannot 
trust the geometry.

Max

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-24 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-23 14:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] block/vpc optimizations Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block/vpc: optimize vpc_co_get_block_status Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:08   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24  6:41     ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block/vpc: simplify vpc_read Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:29   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24  6:44     ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:09       ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vpc: Ignore geometry for large images Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:34   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24  6:45     ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:12       ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block/vpc: make calculate_geometry spec conform Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:59   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24  6:49     ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:14       ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block/vpc: rename footer->size -> footer->current_size Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 19:04   ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54EC86E7.40406@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=carnold@suse.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).