From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36826)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kripper@imatronix.cl>) id 1YQmNK-0006cX-U6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:32:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kripper@imatronix.cl>) id 1YQmNH-0006d1-OP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:32:22 -0500
Received: from abufalia.dnsforhost.com ([67.220.212.159]:47651)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kripper@imatronix.cl>) id 1YQmNH-0006cv-GI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:32:19 -0500
Received: from pc-9-155-239-201.cm.vtr.net ([201.239.155.9]:53615
	helo=[192.168.50.15])
	by abufalia.dnsforhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <kripper@imatronix.cl>)
	id 1YQmNG-0003AZ-BQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:32:18 -0500
Message-ID: <54EE6992.1070107@imatronix.cl>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:32:18 -0300
From: Christopher Pereira <kripper@imatronix.cl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Reopen file descriptors on 'cont' command
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

Does qemu reopen files on a 'cont' command?

When working with images on a gluster volume, file descriptors may get 
into a bad state because of network timeouts, remounting a share, 
etc...and reinitializing file descriptors may be usefull to get paused 
VMs up again.

Related BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058300