From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block/vdi: Add locking for parallel requests
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:34:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F0AAC2.6020202@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F0A957.5090906@redhat.com>
Am 27.02.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Max Reitz:
> On 2015-02-27 at 12:25, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> block/vdi.c was never written for multi-threaded access, see my comment
>> in the header of block/vdi.c:
>>
>> * The code is not thread safe (missing locks for changes in header and
>> * block table, no problem with current QEMU).
>>
>> This was true in the past, but obviously later multi-threaded access was
>> introduced for QEMU. Locking was added for qcow2 and other drivers in
>> 2012 and 2013, but never for vdi.
>>
>> I must admit that I don't know which parts of the block filesystem
>> drivers potentially run in parallel threads.Ideally there would be one
>> or more test cases which test multi-threaded operations and which
>> trigger a failure with the current vdi code.
>>
>> If I had a simple test scenario, I could have a look on the problem.
>
> I have one for you. See the attached ruby script.
>
> (If there are no "Pattern verification failed" messages, everything is
> good)
>
>> The VMDK approach is fine as an intermediate work around, but please use
>> conditional compilation to allow easy tests without coarse locks (and
>> update the comments :-)).
>
> Will a macro defined in vdi.c be enough?
Yes, that would be fine. vdi.c already has several locally defined
CONFIG_VDI_... macros.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 14:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block/vdi: Add locking for parallel requests Max Reitz
2015-02-27 16:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-02-27 16:57 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 17:25 ` Stefan Weil
2015-02-27 17:28 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 17:34 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2015-02-27 18:07 ` Stefan Weil
2015-02-27 18:09 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 18:12 ` Stefan Weil
2015-02-27 18:15 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 18:55 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 20:21 ` Stefan Weil
2015-02-27 20:23 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 20:37 ` Stefan Weil
2015-02-27 17:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-27 17:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-27 18:09 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 18:27 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-27 21:44 ` Stefan Weil
2015-02-27 21:46 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F0AAC2.6020202@weilnetz.de \
--to=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).