From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YReWa-0001zd-EI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 05:21:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YReWZ-0003Un-LM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 05:21:32 -0500 Message-ID: <54F19698.10307@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:21:12 +0800 From: Gonglei MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1425023419-12244-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <1425023419-12244-3-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <54F18FE7.50602@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <54F19194.6050805@huawei.com> <54F19606.4090609@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <54F19606.4090609@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/9] arm: fix memory leak List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, armbru@redhat.com On 2015/2/28 18:18, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 28.02.2015 12:59, Gonglei wrote: >> On 2015/2/28 17:52, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> This patch does not apply to current tree. >>> >> You meant this one should be accepted by arm tree? > > Nope. I mean this patch does not apply to my tree. I found the > problem -- it is because of "Remove superfluous '\n' around error_report()" > series which changed the context slightly. I applied this one > too. > ok, thank you. Regards, -Gonglei