From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YS0lW-0007GX-M4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 05:06:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YS0lV-0003N2-Rc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 05:06:26 -0500 Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <54F2E496.7000700@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 11:06:14 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1425118124-11888-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <54F194B7.9080603@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <54F1EF7A.4040007@redhat.com> <54F1F13C.9070204@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <54F1F13C.9070204@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] e500: fix memory leak List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil , Michael Tokarev , arei.gonglei@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org On 28/02/2015 17:47, Stefan Weil wrote: >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > > Which one of the two patch variants did you review? > > I suggest using Michael's version (only one g_free as early as > possible). For that variant, my review may be added: > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil I also referred to Michael's. Paolo