From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSEzW-0002bw-3S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:17:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSEzS-0004NA-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:17:50 -0500 Message-ID: <54F3BA15.1040408@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:17:09 +0800 From: Gonglei MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1425118124-11888-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <54F194B7.9080603@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <54F1EF7A.4040007@redhat.com> <54F1F13C.9070204@weilnetz.de> <54F2E496.7000700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54F2E496.7000700@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] e500: fix memory leak List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Weil , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org On 2015/3/1 18:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 28/02/2015 17:47, Stefan Weil wrote: >>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini >> >> Which one of the two patch variants did you review? >> >> I suggest using Michael's version (only one g_free as early as >> possible). For that variant, my review may be added: >> >> Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil > > I also referred to Michael's. > OK, thanks. Michael, need I send another version? Or you own handle it directly? Regards, -Gonglei