From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSQ8a-0005xF-7R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:11:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSQ8U-0004zN-1G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:11:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSQ8T-0004zG-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:11:49 -0500 Message-ID: <54F4618D.1050205@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:11:41 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54F45893.5080802@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Delaying -rc0? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel On 02/03/2015 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on >> vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3 >> planning page in the end never got out the "draft" state. > > Well, I said you probably didn't want to schedule rc0 for > while I was on holiday, but nobody changed the dates... > > My current intention is just to keep applying pullreqs > and then to look again at where we are once I'm back at > work. There are almost certainly pending ARM patches > which I need to assemble into a pullreq too. > >> A possible alternative schedule could be: >> >> 2015-03-10 Tag v2.3.0-rc0 > > Hugely optimistic. I'm not likely to tag rc0 my first day > back at work :-) I'll take that as a yes for the delay and a no for the schedule... Paolo >> 2015-03-17 Tag v2.3.0-rc1 >> 2015-03-24 Tag v2.3.0-rc2 >> 2015-03-31 Tag v2.3.0-rc3 >> 2015-04-03 Tag v2.3.0 (or -rc4, with release on April 7th) > > -- PMM >